Once you’re required to take an RMD, you can’t decide not to — skip it, or take less than required, and the penalty is steep: 25% of the amount you should have withdrawn (reduced to 10% if corrected within a defined window under SECURE 2.0). So the RMD itself isn’t optional. What *is* still in your control is how much of a tax bill that withdrawal actually creates. I’ve been mapping out three strategies, and I’m starting on one of them well before my first RMD is even due.
1. Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs). If you’re 70½ or older, you can direct up to a set annual limit (currently $105,000 per person, indexed for inflation) straight from your IRA to a qualified charity, and that amount counts toward your RMD without being added to your taxable income at all. This is different from donating cash and taking a charitable deduction — a QCD reduces your income directly, which matters even if you don’t itemize deductions, and it can help keep you under IRMAA thresholds and reduce the taxable portion of your Social Security. For anyone already charitably inclined, this is close to a free lunch: the same giving you’d likely do anyway, structured in a way that lowers your tax bill instead of just itemizing a deduction you might not even qualify for.
2. Roth conversions before RMDs start. I’ve written about this strategy in more depth separately, but the connection to RMDs specifically is this: every dollar moved to a Roth IRA before your RMDs begin is a dollar permanently removed from the pool of money that generates future required withdrawals. It’s the only strategy on this list that actually shrinks the RMD itself, rather than managing the tax consequences of an RMD you’re stuck taking.
3. Timing withdrawals to manage tax bracket thresholds, not just RMD minimums. Even before RMDs are mandatory, taking voluntary withdrawals in lower-income years — filling up the lower brackets deliberately — spreads taxable income across more years instead of concentrating it into the RMD years when the required amounts, and correspondingly your tax bracket, tend to be higher. This only works if you have flexibility (other income sources, or a cash cushion) that lets you choose when to pull from tax-deferred accounts rather than needing to wait until RMDs force the issue.
A detail I almost missed: the taxable-Social-Security interaction compounds all of this. Up to 85% of Social Security benefits become taxable once your “combined income” (adjusted gross income + nontaxable interest + half your Social Security benefit) crosses set thresholds. An RMD that pushes your combined income over that threshold doesn’t just get taxed itself — it can drag a larger share of your Social Security benefit into taxable territory at the same time, which is a second, less visible tax cost of an oversized RMD.
None of these strategies eliminate the reality that tax-deferred accounts eventually generate a tax bill — that was the deal all along in exchange for the upfront deduction. But the size and timing of that bill is more within your control in the years before RMDs start than it is once they begin. I’m using the years between now and 73 specifically to shrink the balance that will drive that first required withdrawal, rather than waiting to react to whatever number the IRS table hands me.
It’s also worth checking your state’s tax treatment separately from the federal picture, since the two don’t always match. Some states fully tax IRA and 401(k) withdrawals the same as federal law, some offer partial exemptions for retirement income above a certain age, and a handful don’t tax retirement account withdrawals at all. I hadn’t thought to check my own state’s specific treatment until I started planning conversions, and the answer changed how aggressively I’m willing to fill a given federal bracket, since a conversion that looks efficient federally can look different once the state tax layer is added on top.
State residency itself is worth a second look for anyone weighing a future move as part of retirement, since it can matter more to your RMD-era tax bill than most of the strategies above combined. Moving from a state that taxes retirement withdrawals fully to one that doesn’t tax them at all, timed before RMDs begin in earnest, can outweigh the benefit of any single-year tax-bracket optimization. It’s not a reason to choose where to live on tax grounds alone, but it’s a factor worth having on the table alongside the more granular, year-by-year strategies above.
I’m not a tax advisor. QCD limits, RMD ages, and taxation thresholds are all set by current law and can change — verify current figures with a CPA or IRS Publication 590-B before acting.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a Qualified Charitable Distribution?
A QCD lets you send up to a set annual limit directly from your IRA to a qualified charity once you’re 70½ or older, counting toward your RMD without adding to your taxable income at all.
Can I avoid taxes on my RMD entirely?
Not entirely — but strategies like QCDs, pre-RMD Roth conversions, and timing voluntary withdrawals in lower-income years can meaningfully reduce the tax impact compared to doing nothing.
Does an RMD affect how much of my Social Security is taxed?
Yes — an RMD that pushes your combined income over certain thresholds can make up to 85% of your Social Security benefit taxable, on top of the RMD’s own tax.
Leave a Reply